It was working last week Payday loan Why not

Archive

Archive for December, 2009

CGM Focus Fund - Good or Bad?

December 31st, 2009 1 comment
So many people put so much money in after 2008’s stellar year that the dollar weighted average investor lost money (-11% per year) over the same decade that saw the fund perform very well.
Fortune Magazine did investors no favor when they made Ken Heebner their cover boy in March 2008 - just in time to suck in ‘rear view mirror’ investors like lambs to the slaughter.

 

  • FUND TRACK - WSJ
  • DECEMBER 31, 2009

    Best Stock Fund of the Decade: CGM Focus

    By ELEANOR LAISE

    Meet the decade’s best-performing U.S. diversified stock mutual fund: Ken Heebner’s $3.7 billion CGM Focus Fund, which rose more than 18% annually and outpaced its closest rival by more than three percentage points.

    Too bad investors weren’t around to enjoy much of those gains. The typical CGM Focus shareholder lost 11% annually in the 10 years ending Nov. 30, according to investment research firm Morningstar Inc.


    These investor returns, also known as dollar-weighted returns, incorporate the effect of cash flowing in and out of the fund as shareholders buy and sell. Investor returns can be lower than mutual-fund total returns because shareholders often buy a fund after it has had a strong run and sell as it hits bottom.

    At the close of a dismal decade for stocks, the CGM Focus results show how even strategies that work well don’t always pay off for investors. The fund, a highly concentrated portfolio typically holding fewer than 25 large-company stocks, offers “a really potent investment style, but it’s really hard for investors to use well,” says Christopher Davis, senior fund analyst at Morningstar.

    The gap between CGM Focus’s 10-year investor returns and total returns is among the worst of any fund tracked by Morningstar. The fund’s hot-and-cold performance likely widened that gap. The fund surged 80% in 2007. Investors poured $2.6 billion into CGM Focus the following year, only to see the fund sink 48%. Investors then yanked more than $750 million from the fund in the first eleven months of 2009, though it is up about 11% for the year through Tuesday.

    “A huge amount of money came in right when the performance of the fund was at a peak,” says Mr. Heebner, the fund’s manager since its 1997 launch. “I don’t know what to say about that. We don’t have any control over what investors do.”

    Among bond funds, the decade’s top performer is GMO Emerging Country Debt, which rose 15% annually in the 10 years ended Tuesday. Though that fund also had its share of volatility, investors fared well, trailing only about one percentage point behind the fund’s total returns in the 10 years ended in November. The GMO fund caters mainly to big institutions, while the CGM fund is more accessible to small investors.

    How will CGM and GMO fare in the future? Tom Cooper, co-manager of the GMO fund, thinks emerging-market bonds can deliver 8% to 10% annual returns in the next decade. As for Mr. Heebner, though the stock market had a huge rebound this year, he says, “for individual companies, there’s a lot of potential not yet realized.”

  • Jacobs Engineering Group [JEC] offers exceptional value.

    December 31st, 2009 5 comments

    Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. provides professional, technical, and construction services. Its principal services comprise various aspects of engineering and construction, operations, and maintenance, as well as scientific and specialty consulting services. They serve companies and organizations including industrial, commercial, and government clients across multiple markets and geographies. Primary service markets include aerospace and defense, automotive and industrial, buildings, chemicals and polymers, consumer and forest products, energy, environmental programs, infrastructure, oil and gas, refining, technology, and pharmaceuticals and biotechnology. Jacobs Engineering has about 160 offices in 20 countries, with operations in North America, the United Kingdom, Europe, India, Australia, and Asia. JEC was founded in 1947 and is headquartered in Pasadena, California.jec-logo

    Due to its oil and gas industry exposure Jacobs earnings and share price peaked in 2007-2008. Shares hit highs of $99.60 and $103.30 in those years before toughing at $26 when the market melted down last November. The share price recovered to $54.70 early in 2009 before settling back to this morning’s price of $37.80.

    Why did the price drop back again? Management lowered FY 2010 expectations. While there is no clear consensus Zacks now sees FY 2010 and FY 2011 at $2.38 and $2.75 while Value Line is looking for $2.60 and $2.69 respectively. Standard & Poors now carries estimates of $2.50 and $3.15.

    Here are Jacob’s per share [split-adjusted] numbers from continuing operations as reported by Value Line:

    FY*

    Sales

    C/F

    EPS

    B/V

    Avg. P/E

    52-Wk.Range

    2000

    32.39

    1.09

    0.71

    4.70

    11.6x

    6.50-12.30

    2001

    36.81

    1.18

    0.81

    5.51

    17.0x

    10.60-18.90

    2002

    41.59

    1.32

    0.99

    6.30

    17.5x

    13.00-21.50

    2003

    41.33

    1.46

    1.14

    7.54

    17.1x

    17.50-25.00

    2004

    40.51

    1.44

    1.13

    8.86

    19.3x

    18.40-24.10

    2005

    48.47

    1.71

    1.29

    9.81

    20.2x

    22.30-34.70

    2006

    62.90

    2.08

    1.64

    12.06

    23.4x

    33.60-46.60

    2007

    70.49

    2.85

    2.35

    15.34

    21.6X

    38.30-99.60

    2008

    91.70

    3.98

    3.34

    18.30

    24.1X

    26.00-103.30

    2009

    92.32

    3.92

    3.21

    21.15

    12.9X

    30.20-54.70

    * FYs end Sep. 30th of the same year

     

    Jacobs has steadily raised its sales per share and book value without the need for borrowing. As of Oct. 2, 2009 their total debt was $18.2 million against corporate cash of $1.033 billion. Management expects to use their strong balance sheet to finance some acquisitions which should add to future growth.

    Even using the lowest estimates, JEC now trades for 16x this FY’s and 14x FY 2011’s earnings. Those are very low multiples for a high-quality issue while EPS are near a cyclical low point. Once earnings begin to pick up again it seems likely we’ll see a P/E expansion coupled with EPS of at least $3. A bounce back to even 18x normalized earnings would bring JEC back to the mid-$50’s.

    Read more…

    Two old-line, closed-end funds are worth considering right now-

    December 30th, 2009 No comments

    General American Investors and Adams Express Company

    Closed-end mutual funds are similar to normal open-end mutual funds but offer some distinct advantages. Because they trade like ‘stocks’- selling at market prices rather than NAV - you can often buy them at significant discounts to their true asset values. Secondly, because they manage a fixed pool of dollars their portfolio managers are not subject to the destructive pressures of net cash inflows and withdrawal requests.

    gam-logo

    Retail investors generally pull money out of mutual funds when stocks are cheap forcing money managers to sell when they’d like to be buying. After big gains in the market public investors often plow money into mutual funds while chasing past performance. This forces open-end fund managers to either dilute the performance of older investors, by hoarding the newly deposited cash, or to buy more shares of current or new holdings at now much higher prices than before the rally.

    Closed-end managers avoid these problems because their ‘money flow’ is limited to dividend or capital gains payments and/or occasional secondary or rights offerings. If a closed-end fund gets ‘hot’ demand for the shares will push the share price higher on the exchange where it trades as the fund’s NAV increases. Because the share price can be at a discount to NAV a favored closed-end fund can also see share price gains due to shrinking discounts or even premium to NAV pricing.

    Discounts and premiums to NAV fluctuate in much the same way that normal company stocks sees changes in price to earnings ratios. Big gains can often be made by loading up when a company’s P/E is lower than normal. Similarly, better than typical profits can often be posted by buying closed-end funds when their discounts to NAV are larger than average based on that same fund’s history.

    Here is a generic example of how that would work…

    Starting NAV

    Share Price / Initial Discount

    Ending NAV

    Share Price / Current Discount

    $10.00

    $8.50 / 15%

    $13.00

    $11.96 / 8%

    This theoretical fund’s NAV increased 30% while the shareholders saw a 40.7% net return

    Read more…

    The National Debt Road Trip Video - A Must See!

    December 29th, 2009 No comments

    It’s good to have NRG…NRG Energy looks cheap right now.

    December 29th, 2009 1 comment

    NRG Energy, Inc. is a wholesale power generation company, primarily engaged in the ownership and operation of power generation facilities and the sale of energy, capacity and related products in the United States and internationally. The Company has a diverse portfolio of electric generation facilities in terms of geography, fuel type and dispatch levels. It seeks to maximize operating income through the efficient procurement and management of fuel supplies and maintenance services, and the sale of energy, capacity and ancillary services into attractive spot, intermediate and long-term markets.nrg-logo

    At today’s close of $24.21 NRG shares are down significantly from their 2007 and 2008 highs of $47.20 and $45.80. Earnings can vary widely with competing energy pricing and the effects of hedging activities. There is not a clear view of what to expect. Here are the current EPS views (on continuing operations) for 2009 and 2010 from three different and respected sources…

     

    2009 Estimate

    2010 Estimate

    Value Line

    $3.55

    $2.74

    Yahoo Finance

    $2.86

    $2.08

    Zacks

    $2.74

    $2.11

     

    Even at the low-end expectations NRG now trades for < 8.9x this year’s and under 11.7x next year’s earnings. If the high-end materializes the multiples would be 6.8x and 8.8x respectively.

    Here are the more detailed per share numbers from continuing ops as reported by Value Line:

    Year

    Sales

    C/F

    EPS

    B/V

    Avg. P/E

    Range

    2004

    13.56

    2.13

    0.81

    13.05

    15.4x

    9.00-18.10

    2005

    16.76

    1.56

    0.33

    11.20

    NMF

    15.10-24.70

    2006

    22.98

    4.49

    1.82

    19.35

    13.4x

    20.90-29.70

    2007

    25.30

    4.95

    1.95

    19.35

    20.1x

    27.20-47.20

    2008

    29.38

    6.87

    3.66

    26.56

    9.4x

    14.40-45.80

     

    It is noteworthy that NRG shares changed hands as high as $29.70 - $47.20 in both 2006 and 2007 when earnings were well below both today’s trailing and next year’s expected EPS. Clearly there is big upside potential for buyers at the current quote.

    Morningstar rates NRG at 4-stars (out of 5) and sees ‘fair value’ as $37.00 /share. Standard and Poors also assigns NRG 4-stars (out of 5) and carries a 12-month price target of $30 /share.

    Here are two ways to play NRG using buy/writes for about 5 ½ and/or 24 ½ month time horizons.

    Read more…

    Ciber as a take-over?

    December 18th, 2009 No comments

    Ciber, Inc [NYSE:CBR] was up 17.78% today on more than four times normal volume.

    This is a cheap stock and a good company. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if a take-over bid is being readied.

    Bloomberg on Gold…

    December 18th, 2009 No comments

    Bloomberg.com noted that Gold has risen to over $1100 /oz. (and had touched a new all-time high of $1226.56 recently). Despite 2009’s big run up, they pointed out that anyone who bought Gold at its $850 /oz. peak in January of 1980 would have had a better return in an interest bearing checking account.

    So much for Gold as a long-term inflation hedge.

    This blog is monetized using Are-PayPal WP Plugin
    Powered by WishList Member