The Epitome of Irony
Ultimate
Irony- Major Life Insurance Firms Settle with State AG’s
MetLife,
Prudential and John Hancock agreed to pay $40 MM, $17 MM and $12 MM
respectively to make a multi-state probe go away. These companies were
routinely cross-checking Social Security death records to prevent recurring
annuity benefit payments going out to deceased policy holders. That seems fair
and logical. In fact, SS itself has been criticized for wasting huge sums sending
out checks to dead people.
What was the
focus of the probe then? These companies did not voluntarily use this same data
to offer death benefits to heirs of life insurance policies. Benefits were paid
only if a claim was filed. That was standard operating procedure and perfectly
legal, if not a really savory business practice. Do you pay your personal bills
if they are never presented to you?
Florida’s
insurance commissioner said it was a landmark settlement in terms of the amount
of money ($400 MM) being paid out to consumers. Now that the largest firms have
settled, many smaller companies are being targeted for the same practice.
Here’s where the irony comes in.
The Wall
Street Journal said the probes started when an ambitious, minor league auditing
firm approached several cash-strapped states with the idea that they could
seize these unclaimed life policies as ‘abandoned property’. 35 states signed
up for this cash grab, contracting with Verus Financial LLC and promising them
a cut of their eventual take.
The states, now calling out the
insurance companies for failing to seek out rightful beneficiaries, were looking to take these unpaid death benefits
for themselves- not consumers.
It is
unclear when the decision to switch up to the more altruistic purpose was made.
Perhaps someone involved finally grew a conscience.
*****************************************************************************
Government
agencies looking to confiscate other people’s money apparently are not at all
unusual in today’s world. I was surprised to find clauses in the fine print of
every on-line bank account telling depositors that if they didn’t access their
accounts for just 12 consecutive months that
the entire balance would be turned over to their home state under that same
abandoned property clause. It’s easy to think that savers, especially those
with multi-year CDs would have no reason to keep checking on their accounts. Heirs
of account holders that died might not even know these accounts existed.
Poof, all
your money could be taken away without notice by either your bank or your home
state.
Similarly,
many states are now confiscating unused gift or prepaid card balances as soon
as two years after purchase. AMEX and some other firms are rebelling against
New Jersey’s requirement to have buyers of their prepaid cards give zip codes-
allowing NJ to lay claim to any dollar amounts, bought by Jersey residents, not
used promptly.
It appears
that governments can take consumer value without hesitation even as they accuse
private industry, and extort fines from them, for doing exactly the same thing.
I’m impressed, I must say. Really rarely do I encounter a blog that’s both educative and entertaining, and let me tell you, http://www.beatingbuffett.com have hit the nail on the head. Your idea is outstanding; the issue is something that not enough people are speaking intelligently about. I am very happy that I stumbled across this in my search for something relating to this.
You are making broad accusations that just don’t hold true in every state. Every state has a unclaimed or abandoned property division, usually out of the State Treasurer’s Office. Depending on the state, they have to try to contact the owners of the property that is unclaimed for anywhere from three years to forever. They can’t just take this property and put it into their coffers. In the state I am in that did sign on to to this deal, the state can never take this property. It stays in a segregated account that is searchable, and is regularly advertised year after year.
And again, your contention that it is/was legal for insurance companies to only pay if a claim is filed is again, different from state to state. Again, in my state, when a person dies, the death benefit is set on that day and no matter when it is claimed, an insurance company is obliged to pay that amount.
Instead, standard operating procedure for insurance companies was when someone died and started to miss their payments (obviously), they would deduct the cost of the premium from the value of the policy until they bled the policy dry and closed it down when it had no more value. Hardly a reputable, let alone legal, business practice.
You may not like that these inscrutable companies got caught red handed, but that doesn’t mean that the rightful heirs to these policies don’t deserve to be paid.
@Bob Thompson
Bob,
I never said that the insurance companies were not liable to pay death benefits. My point was that the states initially were out to take the $400 Million for themselves- not the rightful beneficiaries of the policies.
Paul